Archive for the ‘F-35 Joint Strike Fighter’ Category.

Norway to Begin F-35 Negotiations

Military.com | Graham Warwick | June 11, 2009

This article first appeared in Aerospace Daily & Defense Report.

Norway’s defense ministry is to begin negotiations on the purchase of up to 56 Lockheed Martin F-35As after parliament voted to accept its recommendation of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) over the Saab Gripen NG.

Negotiations are expected to take two years, and the government is required to return to parliament in the spring for authorization to begin negotiating the final contract. Norway is already a partner in the JSF program.

Despite an effort by the right-wing Progress Party to send the fighter decision back to the government for further analysis, a majority in parliament voted to endorse the government’s November selection of the F-35.

The defense ministry does not know when a contract will be signed, or how many aircraft will be ordered, but beginning negotiations this year keeps the program on track to allow first deliveries in 2016 and full operational capability in 2020.

Lockheed Martin is planning for Norway to begin buying aircraft in 2014 as part of the eighth low-rate initial production batch. Canada and Denmark also could order their first JSFs at the same time, says Tom Burbage, Lockheed executive vice-president and general manager, F-35 program integration.

Denmark is going though a three-step process, first to decide whether it needs a new fighter, then which one, and finally how many and when. The first two decisions were planned before its parliament recesses at the end of this month, but are expected to slip.

With a requirement for 48 aircraft, JSF program partner Denmark still is hoping to decide between the F-35A, Gripen NG, and Boeing F/A-18E/F before year-end, Burbage says.

Although also a partner in the JSF program, Canada has held its requirement for up to 80 next-generation fighters open to evaluate other candidates, but could now move to a downselect decision this year, Burbage believes.

Among the other international JSF partners, the U.K. has ordered its first two test F-35Bs as part of the 17-aircraft third production lot just awarded. A single test F-35A for the Netherlands also is included, but the Dutch will not make a final decision until 2010.

A third test aircraft for the U.K. and a second for the Netherlands are planned as part of the 32-aircraft LRIP 4 contract to be awarded next year.

Australia has confirmed plans to buy 100 F-35As, beginning with an initial tranche of 75, but has slipped its first purchases by a year to 2012, as part of LRIP 6. Italy, with a requirement for 131 F-35As and Bs, and Turkey, with 100 F-35As, also expected are to begin their purchases in LRIP 6, Burbage says.

Lockheed Martin is conducting a study for Spain, which like Italy operates the AV-8B Harrier +, that will look at the F-35 as a replacement for its F-18s. A similar study is planned for Finland.

Negotiations continue with Israel on the sale of an initial 25 F-35As. Meeting Tel Aviv’s demand for deliveries by 2014 will require agreement by the end of this year, or early in 2010, he says.

Source: Military.com

Bookmark and Share

Defense veto threatened over F-35 fighter engine

By Roxana Tiron
Posted: 06/24/09 04:27 PM [ET]

The White House is threatening to veto the 2010 defense policy bill if it authorizes funding for a second engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.

As the House is preparing to take up the 2010 defense authorization bill, the Office of Management and Budget issued a statement of administration policy stating that the president’s senior advisers would recommend a veto if the final bill “would seriously disrupt the F-35 program.”

The Pentagon strongly objects to the alternative engine produced by General Electric and Rolls Royce. The primary engine is produced by Pratt & Whitney. One of the main reasons for the administration’s opposition to the congressional funding of the second engine is because lawmakers traditionally cut funding for a few F-35s to find the funding necessary for the alternative engine.

The Obama administration also opposes any funding additions to Lockheed Martin’s F-22 program.

This year defense authorizers cut two planes from the Pentagon’s request and authorized $603 million for the GE-Rolls Royce engine.

“These changes will delay the fielding of the Joint Strike Fighter capability and capacity, adversely impacting the Department’s overall strike fighter inventory,” OMB wrote in its statement of administration policy. “In addition, the administration objects to provisions of the bill that mandate an alternative engine program for the JSF.”

OMB argued that the primary engine, produced by Pratt & Whitney, is performing well and has “more than 11,000 test hours.”

“Expenditures on a second engine are unnecessary and impede the progress of the overall JSF program,” OMB said.

The Obama administration is going against a large number of stalwart supporters for an alternative engine, including defense appropriators. Lawmakers argue that having a single engine producer for a large fleet of fighter jets could be too risky.

The “engine wars” started after several fiascos with the F-15 and F-16 fighter jets, which relied on one engine. As a consequence, Congress started an alternative fighter-engine program that provided funding for rival companies to produce engines for the same planes. One company receives a certain percentage of the engine contract and the other one the rest.

Pentagon officials said that while such competition might produce modest savings as it builds more than 2,000 planes, the main engine – the Pratt & Whitney one — is progressing well, making a second engine program unnecessary. But lawmakers are wary about relying on one supplier for such a critical program.

The Government Accountability Office says there may be long-term financial savings to the government from having a second engine program, but contends that any savings will depend on the final approach for the competition, the number of aircraft actually purchased and the ratio of engines awarded to each contractor.

Source: The Hill

Bookmark and Share

F-35 Program Spotlights International Partners

Global Partners Building Global Security

PARIS, FRANCE, June 17th, 2009 — International participants in the Lockheed Martin [NYSE: LMT] F-35 Lightning II program have begun purchasing aircraft and making long-range commitments to integrate the fighter into their fleets, a Lockheed Martin executive said Wednesday at the Paris Air Show.

“Since the start of the year, we have seen the United Kingdom commit to the purchase of their first three operational test and evaluation (OT&E) aircraft, Italy approve in principle the establishment of an F-35 final assembly and checkout facility as well as the purchase of 131 F-35s, and the Netherlands approve funds for the first of two OT&E airplanes,” said Tom Burbage, Lockheed Martin executive vice president and general manager of F-35 Program Integration. “At the same time, Australia has reaffirmed its requirement for 100 F-35s and Israel has begun planning to purchase 25 F-35s initially, with an option for 50 more.”

The F-35 – the world’s only international 5th generation fighter – will replace more than 13 aircraft types and enable allies to conduct seamless operations with new levels of capability that are unavailable in current-generation fighters.

Burbage also discussed the F-35’s role as the centerpiece of global security cooperation — beyond its operational service. “In addition to the aircraft itself providing new levels of interoperability among allied operators, the strong industrial participation within the program from partner nations help provide stability during these uncertain economic times,” he said.

During the briefing, both Burbage and Maj. Gen. (select) David Heinz, Joint Strike Fighter Program Executive Officer highlighted accomplishments in the F-35 program this year, noting that “2009 has been a year of firsts for the F-35 program.”

The year has featured the rollout of the first F-35 equipped with mission systems, the first flight of the second F-35B short takeoff/vertical landing variant, and the first U.S. Marine to pilot an F-35. In preparation for the first vertical landing this fall at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Md., the first F-35B, known as BF-1, tested its propulsion system on a specially instrumented “hover pit” in Fort Worth, Texas, in March, proving that it produces more than enough thrust to carry out all its required missions.

Looking ahead in 2009, flight testing will continue to accelerate, with nine aircraft flying, the stand-up of test sites at Patuxent River and Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., and continued testing of static and durability aircraft. By the close of 2009 the last System Development and Demonstration aircraft will be in final assembly and low-rate initial production lot 1 aircraft will begin rolling out of the Fort Worth factory.

As part of the Wednesday event, a commemorative F-35 coin ceremony was held. Gen. Heinz presented the special coins to representatives of partner nations in honor of each country’s technological innovation, cooperation and funding to the F-35 program. Those countries include the United Kingdom, Italy, the Netherlands, Turkey, Canada, Australia, Denmark and Norway, as well as the United States.

The F-35 is a supersonic, multi-role, 5th generation stealth fighter. Three F-35 variants derived from a common design, developed together and using the same sustainment infrastructure worldwide will replace at least 13 types of aircraft for nine nations initially, making the Lightning II the most cost-effective fighter program in history.

Lockheed Martin is developing the F-35 with its principal industrial partners, Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems. Two separate, interchangeable F-35 engines are under development: the Pratt & Whitney F135 and the GE Rolls-Royce Fighter Engine Team F136.

Headquartered in Bethesda, Md., Lockheed Martin is a global security company that employs about 146,000 people worldwide and is principally engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture, integration and sustainment of advanced technology systems, products and services. The corporation reported 2008 sales of $42.7 billion.

F-35 and Lightning II are trademarks of Lockheed Martin Corporation.

Source: Lockheed Martin

Bookmark and Share

House panel presses Gates to buy existing fighter jets, not F-35s

By Roxana Tiron
Posted: 06/16/09 07:25 PM [ET]
House defense authorizers are pressing Defense Secretary Robert Gates to consider buying existing fighter jets instead of the next-generation F-35 Joint Strike Fighter to curtail a severe fighter jet shortfall in the Air Force National Guard.

During a House Armed Services Committee markup of the 2010 defense authorization bill on Tuesday, lawmakers raised alarm that aircraft shortfalls could present significant challenges to the Air Force’s ability to protect domestic airspace.

At press time, lawmakers had included an amendment sponsored by Reps. Frank LoBiondo (R-N.J.) and Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) that would force Gates to consider buying F-15, F-16 and F-18 aircraft with Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, high-capacity datalink, enhanced avionics and the ability to deploy advanced weapons.

In military parlance, this is a 4.5-generation fighter aircraft outfitted with advanced capabilities.

The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, which the Pentagon wants to move toward instead of the 4.5-generation aircraft, would be a fifth-generation fighter aircraft — the most advanced.

LoBiondo and Giffords’s amendment directs Gates to submit to Armed Services, within 90 days of the authorization bill becoming law, a report on the procurement of 4.5-generation fighter aircraft that must consider that the Air Force has a requirement to maintain no less than 2,200 tactical fighter aircraft from fiscal 2011 through 2035.

LoBiondo said the fighter shortfall would affect the Air National Guard earlier and more severely than it would the Air Force active-duty units.

The lack of aircraft and the advanced age of some of the fighter jets are “devastating” to the Guard, he said. He criticized the Air Force for not producing any plan to fix the fighter shortfall problems, saying it had pegged its hopes on the arrival of the F-35 to solve the problem.

Under the LoBiondo-Giffords amendment, Pentagon officials must consider the procurement cost of those aircraft if they are bought on a yearly basis, and must also give cost estimates for aircraft bought as part of a multiyear contract. If Gates determines that a multiyear contract would yield significant savings and decides that the Pentagon should be buying those aircraft as part of such a contract, he would have to submit the necessary Pentagon certifications for the contract together with the fiscal 2011 budget request.

The amendment also asks the Pentagon to assess whether it would be possible to recapitalize the Air National Guard with F-35 Joint Strike Fighters from 2015 through 2025.

The Guard conducts the majority of domestic airspace protection missions, known as air sovereignty alert operations and homeland defense air missions. Fully armed fighter aircraft are on alert 24 hours a day at 18 sites across the country. The Air National Guard operates 16 of the 18 sites. The remaining two are under active-duty Air Force responsibilities.

The aircraft used in the domestic airspace protection missions —Lockheed’s F-16 and Boeing’s F-15 — are showing signs of aging. The aircraft used by the National Guard traditionally come used from the active-duty Air Force, which means that the equipment already has significant wear and tear.

The commander of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) is charged with the missions of aerospace warning and control for North America. The Air Force provides NORAD with personnel and equipment for these operations, including fighter aircraft.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) earlier this year found that the Air Force gave short shrift to preparing for its domestic mission as it has focused more on overseas military operations following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. The National Guard has also deployed heavily overseas.

“Failure to develop detailed plans to address these challenges could jeopardize the Air Force’s ability to protect U.S. airspace in the future,” read the GAO report, released on Jan. 26.

The planes flown by the Air National Guard are the oldest aircraft ever flown in Air Force history. Eleven of the 18 sites could end up without viable aircraft by 2020 if the planes are not replaced over the next few years, according to the GAO. The oldest planes are also more difficult and expensive to maintain.

Meanwhile, 14 of the 18 sites will have to suspend their operations for a period of time between 2010 and 2020, as their aircraft reach the end of their useful service lives. Twelve sites are currently equipped with F-16 fighters, which will reach the end of their service lives between 2015 and 2020.

One option is to replace the F-16s with either F-22s or F-35s, both of which the Air Force is acquiring. However, according to the current F-22 and F-35 fielding schedules, only one of the units —Shaw Air Force Base — will receive the new aircraft soon enough, according to the GAO.

The tug-of-war will likely intensify between the Air Force and a number of factions in Congress over whether the Air Force should buy cutting-edge — but expensive — fighter jets, such as the F-22 Raptor and the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, or continue buying and modernizing older aircraft, such as F-15s, F-16s or F-18s.

Meanwhile, on another hot-button issue — missile defense — Democrats on the committee rejected GOP efforts to authorize an additional $120 million to buy 14 more ground-based interceptors for the mid-course defense system at Fort Greely, Alaska.

The Obama administration only wants 30 ground-based interceptors split between Alaska and California. The additional 14 would have brought that number to 44.

Source: The Hill

Bookmark and Share

Lockheed Martin Meets F-35 Schedule Commitment With Roll-Out of Radar-Signature Test Aircraft

FORT WORTH, Texas and PARIS, June 15 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — A detailed, full-scale representation of the Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) F-35 Lightning II stealth fighter rolled out of the Fort Worth factory today, with production-representative Very Low Observable airframe structure and coatings. Along with dedicated flight test aircraft, the model will be a key component in validating the F-35’s radar-evading properties.

“Today’s milestone is the realization of an F-35 test schedule commitment we made more than two years ago,” said Dan Crowley, F-35 executive vice president and program manager for the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike fighter program. “We continue to achieve outstanding progress in F-35 design, development, production, ground test and early flight test.”

J.D. McFarlan, Lockheed Martin vice president of F-35 Development, said the F-35 Highly Accurate Low Observable (HALO) radar pole model is fully representative of the F-35’s radar signature. “The aircraft will be used in tests that provide data about the radar-signature characteristics of the F-35 aircraft family.”

Initial testing of the model will occur in Lockheed Martin’s new Acceptance Test Facility in Fort Worth - a radio frequency-secure building - with follow-on testing conducted at a remote site. The Acceptance Test Facility will be used to provide the required data on the stealth performance of all F-35s before delivery. At the remote site, the model will be affixed to a tall pole and tested in the open air, hence the term “pole model.”

Crowley said the program is making crucial progress across all fronts. “All nine F-35 partners are on track with the United States, Italy and Norway having down-selected to the F-35. We are on track to support the Low Rate Initial Production delivery plan and to meet the Initial Operational Capability dates of the services. Test aircraft are returning from missions without technical problems in 80 percent of our flights. Engine performance has been flawless in flight. The first eight development aircraft all were delivered within 60 days on average of the schedule we committed to in February 2008, and the list goes on.”

Key partners in the construction of the model included Janicki Industries, Fain Models and Northrop Grumman.

“As the first F-35 air frame to complete all production finishing processes, HALO also provided the Component and Aircraft Final Finishes teams with valuable experience that will translate to improvements in processes for all subsequent production aircraft,” McFarlan said.

The F-35 is a supersonic, multi-role, 5th generation stealth fighter. Three F-35 variants derived from a common design, developed together and using the same sustainment infrastructure worldwide will replace at least 13 types of aircraft for 11 nations initially, making the Lightning II the most cost-effective fighter program in history.

Lockheed Martin is developing the F-35 with its principal industrial partners, Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems. Two separate, interchangeable F-35 engines are under development: the Pratt & Whitney F135 and the GE Rolls-Royce Fighter Engine Team F136.

Headquartered in Bethesda, Md., Lockheed Martin is a global security company that employs about 146,000 people worldwide and is principally engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture, integration and sustainment of advanced technology systems, products and services. The corporation reported 2008 sales of $42.7 billion.

F-35 and Lightning II are trademarks of Lockheed Martin Corporation.

For additional information, visit our Web site:

http://www.lockheedmartin.com

SOURCE Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company

Bookmark and Share

Lockheed Martin Receives $2.1 Billion For Third Lot Of F-35 Low-Rate Production

FORT WORTH, Texas, June 3rd, 2009 — The United States Department of Defense has awarded Lockheed Martin [NYSE: LMT] a $2.1 billion contract modification to produce 17 F-35 Lightning II stealth fighters in the third lot of low-rate initial production (LRIP). The buy also includes the first international orders – two F-35 operational test aircraft for the United Kingdom and one for the Netherlands.

The contract adds to a May 2008 award of $197 million to fund LRIP 3 long-lead materials, and to a March 2009 contract modification award of $320 million for tooling and test equipment, also beginning in LRIP 3.

Assembly of 14 aircraft in the first two LRIP lots is already under way, with initial F-35 deliveries to the U.S. Air Force scheduled to begin in 2010. Eight development aircraft have entered testing, and the remaining 11 are planned to roll out by year’s end.

“As we move more deeply into F-35 production, we are seeing the steady increases in quality and efficiency that track to our target production rate of one aircraft per working day in the 2015 time frame,” said Dan Crowley, Lockheed Martin executive vice president and F-35 program general manager.

In March and April, Lockheed Martin received additional contracts totaling $306 million to prepare for the production of 32 additional F-35 Lightning II fighters in LRIP 4. The U.S. and eight nations partnering in the project plan to acquire 3,173 F-35 fighters.

The F-35 is maturing and retiring technical risk rapidly, with 70 percent of system software complete and on schedule, early production processes delivering aircraft with quality levels that surpass those of mature fighter programs, and flight-test aircraft that have recorded zero technical discrepancies in more than 80 percent of their missions.

The F-35 is a supersonic, multi-role, 5th generation stealth fighter. Three F-35 variants derived from a common design, developed together and using the same sustainment infrastructure worldwide, will replace at least 13 types of aircraft for nine nations initially, making the Lightning II the most cost-effective fighter program in history.

Lockheed Martin is developing the F-35 with its principal industrial partners, Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems. Two separate, interchangeable F-35 engines are under development: the Pratt & Whitney F135 and the GE Rolls-Royce Fighter Engine Team F136.

Headquartered in Bethesda, Md., Lockheed Martin is a global security company that employs about 146,000 people worldwide and is principally engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture, integration and sustainment of advanced technology systems, products and services. The corporation reported 2008 sales of $42.7 billion.

F-35 and Lightning II are trademarks of Lockheed Martin Corporation

Source: Lockheed Martin

Bookmark and Share

US Air Force to Get More F-35 Stealth Fighters

04 June 2009

The US Air Force (USAF) will receive seven more F-35 Lightning II stealth fighters from Lockheed Martin in the third batch of the low-rate initial production (LRIP).

The $857m fighter acquisition by the air force is part of a larger contract of $2.1bn awarded by the US department of Defense to Lockheed for delivering a total 17 F-35s to the USAF, the US Marine Corps, the Netherlands and the UK.

The air force will pay $122.4m for each of the seven conventional take off and landing aircraft.

Previously, deals had been struck with Lockheed worth $517m in the first and second phase of LRIP for purchase of these stealth fighters.

Assembly of 14 crafts is underway. Eight development aircraft being tested while 11 more are to be delivered by end of 2009.

Lockheed plans to achieve the one-aircraft-a-working-day target by 2015 with the production of F-35s.

The F-35 is a supersonic, multirole, fifth generation stealth fighter capable of undertaking mature fighter programmes.

Three variants of the F-35s are expected to replace at least 13 types of aircraft in nine nations.

Source: Air Force Technology

Bookmark and Share

Pratt & Whitney F135 STOVL Exceeds and Completes Vertical Thrust Requirement

Press Release

EAST HARTFORD, Conn., May 18, 2009 - The Pratt & Whitney F135 short takeoff/vertical landing (STOVL) variant propulsion system, which includes the Rolls-Royce LiftSystem®, has exceeded thrust performance expectations in recently completed tests, providing more vertical power than required by the F-35 Lightning II STOVL aircraft. The testing was conducted on a specially instrumented “hover pit” at Lockheed Martin in Fort Worth, Texas. Pratt & Whitney is a United Technologies Corp. (NYSE:UTX) company.

“The F135 engine continues to exceed performance expectations to deliver the most advanced, capable fifth generation fighter engine for the F-35,” said Warren Boley, vice president, Pratt & Whitney F135/F119 Programs. “The engine demonstrated 41,100 pounds of vertical thrust against our requirement of 40,550 pounds. This means we will deliver excellent margin for the vertical landing and short takeoff performance for our STOVL customers.”

During hover-pit testing, the aircraft is anchored to a metal grate 14 feet above a sloped concrete floor, separating the jet from ground effect and enabling it to simulate free-air flight. Sensors measure thrust and the aircraft’s response to pilot inputs. This is a highly integrated software driven airplane where the testing also demonstrates functional operation of all systems required for vertical flight. This includes control of the doors associated with the STOVL propulsion system: engine auxiliary inlet, LiftFan inlet, LiftFan exit, roll posts, and doors that open to enable the Rolls-Royce three-bearing swivel duct to articulate and vector engine thrust. The hover-pit tests are the final series of ground tests before airborne STOVL testing begins. The F135 STOVL propulsion system includes the Pratt & Whitney main engine and the Rolls-Royce LiftSystem components.

For eight years and more than 11,300 test hours, Pratt & Whitney has been designing, developing and testing the F135 to deliver the most advanced fifth generation fighter engine for the U.S. Air Force, Marine Corps and Navy, as well as eight international partner countries.

The F135 propulsion system is the power of choice for the F-35 and has proven it can meet diverse aircraft requirements. The ground and flight test experience demonstrates the maturity and the associated reliability of the F135 engine for armed forces around the world.

Pratt & Whitney is a world leader in the design, manufacture and service of aircraft engines, space propulsion systems and industrial gas turbines. United Technologies, based in Hartford, Conn., is a diversified company providing high technology products and services to the global aerospace and commercial building industries.

# # #

© 2009, United Technologies Corp. - Pratt & Whitney

Source: Pratt & Whitney

Bookmark and Share

Air Force fields special flight suit for JSF

By Bruce Rolfsen - Staff writer
Posted : Tuesday May 5, 2009 18:25:55 EDT
Air Force Times

Pilots flying the F-35 Lightning II are getting their own flight suit, a more comfortable one that will protect their arms if they have to eject from the stealth fighter.

The sage-green flight suit looks like the one now worn by thousands of other airmen except for no line-cutter pocket on the left leg and the addition of a removable fabric cord attached to each upper sleeve, said Cheryl Limrick, a spokeswoman for the Joint Strike Fighter program office in Arlington, Va.

Officially called the “JSF light-weight coverall,” the flight suit has been tested by designer RFD Beaufort but isn’t being worn yet by the Air Force’s handful of Joint Strike Fighter pilots, Limrick said. No date has been set for when the pilots will get the flight suit.

RFD Beaufort, a British firm specializing in aviation survival gear, is also making cold-weather, fire-retardant underwear and an anti-G vest and pants for the JSF pilots, she said. The pants will have the line-cutter pocket that was dropped from the flight suit.

Pilots wear the fabric cords only when they’re in the cockpit. The cords connect to the centerline harness buckle on the ejection seat and come into play only if the pilot starts to eject.

The cords are drawn tight once the pilot pulls the ejection seat handle between his legs and the seat begins to rocket out of the cockpit. The arm restraints prevent the pilot’s arms from flaying; contact with debris or the cockpit during a high-speed ejection can seriously injure the pilot.

Once the pilot is clear of the plane and separates from the ejection seat, his arms go free.

TERESA METZGER Dr. Joo Choi, a research scholar with the 711th Human Performance Wing at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, measures 2nd Lt. Nathan D. Mueller during a fit test for the new flight suit.

The flight suit is made of an improved fire-resistant fabric developed by Dupont, Limrick said. “Nomex Comfort” feels better against the skin than DuPont’s commonly used Nomex III fabric because it is made of smaller, finer filaments.

The finer filaments produce a trio of improvements:

* More of the fabric touches the skin to wick away sweat and moisture.

* Smaller threads create a smoother fabric that doesn’t run against skin, similar to why a bed sheet with high thread count is smoother than a sheet with a low thread count.

* The finer threads are more tightly woven together, making the fabric more durable. The material is less likely to pull apart at the seams or pill in areas that are rubbed against such as elbows. Airmen wearing flight suits often complain about pilling and unsightly seams.

Part of fielding the flight suit includes making sure it fits well.

Researchers from Air Force Materiel Command’s 711th Human Performance Wing spent two weeks in March at Laughlin Air Force Base, Texas, asking pilots to compare the fit of their current flight suit to the new flight suit, said Greg Zehner, the 711th’s anthropologist.

The team asked pilots to do several tasks such as lifting their legs or bending over to tie their shoes and rate the suit’s comfort as they moved about.

The 711th staff also measured the pilots to compare their arm length and inseam, for example, to uniform sizes.

Bookmark and Share

F-35 Joint Strike Fighter still good value for U.S.

By LOREN B. THOMPSON
Published: May 4, 2009 at 10:53 AM

ARLINGTON, Va., May 4 (UPI) — When U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates “rebalanced” the Pentagon budget recently, he put the future of fighter aviation in the United States on the shoulders of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter.

The U.S. Navy will probably buy more Boeing F/A-18s, and the U.S. Congress may do right by the Air Force and fund 60 more Lockheed Martin/Boeing F-22 Raptors, but after that, it’s all F-35. And the U.S. defense establishment in Washington probably won’t be able to resist putting the mammoth program through an intense round of scrutiny. Can the Lockheed Martin F-35 deliver?

In the 1990s the Clinton administration scrapped several other new U.S. aircraft to pool money and research for a born-joint tactical aircraft program. Britain joined in, and later so did several other allied partners. The F-35 Lightning Joint Strike Fighter picked up innovations from the F-22 Raptor program, but it also cleared hurdles of its own, such as development of a revolutionary lift-fan engine for the short take-off and vertical landing version requested by the U.S. Marine Corps. The result was joint and global. Three close-cousin variants of F-35 will deliver to the Marines, allies, the U.S. Air Force and the U.S. Navy.

Three things stand out about the F-35 Lightning Joint Strike Fighter. First is its production line. In an era when U.S. manufacturing is under pressure, the F-35 line in Fort Worth, Texas, is one that will make you feel good about the United States. The line is a marvel of sophisticated automation, laser-guided assembly and precision tolerances. The F-35’s exterior stealth materials are light years beyond previous coatings. They go on more evenly and are so durable that factory officials let visitors literally walk on samples of the radar-absorbing material.

Second, the F-35 Lightning is a good value. Yes, it will be expensive overall because of its sheer magnitude. What makes it a good value is its efficiency. Ramping up to production of more than 100 aircraft per year will create momentum and help keep unit costs in line. Third, the F-35 Lightning is a hard-power weapon but a soft-power partnership. Achieving true interoperability with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and its member states and other allies will be doubly important as air forces shrink because of decreased defense spending.

However, a few clouds are gathering on the F-35 Lightning’s horizon, of course. Intensive flight testing of the F-35 is getting under way, and flight tests usually do yield change orders. Expect the F-35 to have fewer changes than normal because so many of the systems have been pre-tested in labs or on other flying aircraft.

The bigger risk by far will come if the U.S. Department of Defense slows production or cuts the total buy. The so-called acceleration of the F-35 program briefed by Gates sped up parts of the test program but was dwarfed by the much bigger decision to cap peak yearly production for the U.S. Air Force at 80 F-35s per year, instead of the 110 per year budgeted by the service.

The Gates budget will actually leave the U.S. Air Force with almost 80 fewer F-35 Joint Strike Fighters in this five-year budget cycle. If this is a sign of more cuts to come, that’s a problem.

Understand that the U.S. Air Force has no other advanced fighter, bomber or unmanned combat aircraft in development in the wake of the Gates decisions. On the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program’s broad shoulders rest significant hard- and soft-power options for the United States in the years to come.

(Loren B. Thompson is chief operating officer of the Lexington Institute, an Arlington, Va.-based think tank that supports democracy and the free market.)

© 2009 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Bookmark and Share

Obama cuts target $465M GE-Rolls Royce engine

By Roxana Tiron
Posted: 05/07/09 11:26 AM [ET]
The Hill

The Pentagon will scrap $465 million in funding for the Joint Strike Fighter alternative engine in a move sure to roil supporters in Congress.

President Obama singled out the elimination of the engine’s funding in remarks Thursday on the budget, which proposes $17 billion in cuts. About half of those cuts come to defense programs, most of which were previously announced.

Obama said the alternative engine built by General Electric and Britain’s Rolls-Royce is one of several “unnecessary defense programs that do nothing to keep us safe.” He also noted the Pentagon has resisted funding for the engine for years.

“The Defense Department is already pleased with the engine it has,” Obama said. “They do not want — and do not plan to use — the alternate version. That’s why the Pentagon stopped requesting this funding two years ago. Yet it’s still being funded.”

Pratt & Whitney built the first engine for the Joint Strike Fighter and has been lobbying for several years to eliminate funding for the second engine. GE and Rolls-Royce have put up a fierce fight to continue its funding.

The stakes are high for the companies. If funding is eliminated for the second engine, they could be effectively shut out of the largest fighter-jet market for the next 40 years, several defense industry sources said.

After several fiascos with the F-14, F-15 and F-16 fighter jets, which relied on one engine made by Pratt & Whitney, Congress more than a decade ago started an alternative fighter-engine program. The battle to build the two engines became known as the “great engine war.”

The result of such battles is that one company receives a certain percentage of the engine contract and another the rest. Congress has provided funding to GE and Rolls-Royce for the alternate-engine program since 1996.

The decision on the alternative engine is one of several in the budget that could make European allies unhappy. The United Kingdom is one of the most significant partners in the JSF — and the decision to scrap the Rolls-Royce engine already caused tension during the Bush presidency, which tried without success to get Congress to end the program.

The cancellation of the presidential helicopter could also reverberate among allied countries that have eyed the Pentagon for contract opportunities. The presidential helicopter has been under contract to Lockheed Martin and Agusta Westland, a British-Italian venture.

Citing delays in the schedule and increasing costs, the White House canceled the presidential helicopter. The Obama administration allocated $85 million for 2010 to cover termination costs, efforts to look at other alternatives for a new helicopter and to extend the life of the current, decades-old presidential helicopter.

The president’s decision will not pass through Congress without a fight. A significant number of lawmakers believe that the White House should keep the current contract and buy a less sophisticated version of the VH-71.

Feathers could also be ruffled by the decision to scale down the C-27J procurement (also known as the Joint Cargo Aircraft program). The cargo plane is under contract with Alenia’s American arm. Alenia is a unit of the Italian conglomerate Finmeccanica.

Bookmark and Share

F-35 ARRIVES IN THE UK FOR STATIC TESTING

27 Apr 2009 | Ref. 070/2009
BAE Systems

After a three-week ocean voyage, the first structural test airframe for the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II, also known as the Joint Strike Fighter, has arrived in the United Kingdom. The F-35A conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) variant static test airframe (referred to as AG-1) , will undergo testing in the Structural and Dynamic Test facility at BAE Systems’ site in Brough, East Yorkshire, England.

Mick Ord, BAE Systems’ managing director of the F-35 Lightning II business said, “This is another major milestone in the F-35 programme and we’re delighted to take delivery of the full-scale static testing airframe. BAE Systems is a principal sub-contractor to Lockheed Martin on the F-35 programme and brings military aircraft expertise that is critical to the F-35 Lightning II airframe and systems. We lead on several work share areas, of which structural testing is one.”

AG-1 began its travels on March 27 at Lockheed Martin’s Fort Worth, Texas, plant. It was shipped overland to the Texas coast, where it was placed aboard a U.K-bound cargo ship. AG-1 is one of six static test airframes constructed for the System Development and Demonstration phase of the F-35 Lightning II programme, which is developing and validating all of the aircraft’s systems and manufacturing techniques. Another 13 F-35s are dedicated to flight testing.

“The work BAE Systems is performing on AG-1 highlights just one of the United Kingdom’s many indigenous industrial capabilities that this programme relies upon,” said Tom Burbage, Lockheed Martin executive vice president and general manager of F-35 Programme Integration. “We are conducting the largest-ever test programme for a fighter, and the BAE Systems structural test facilities expand our bandwidth and help us maintain our schedule.”

Mick Ord added, “BAE Systems is responsible for carrying out a large percentage of the structural and fatigue testing required to qualify all three of the F-35 variants. Some testing has been carried out on smaller components, but this will be among the first of the full airframe tests to be carried out.”

F-35 ARRIVES IN THE UK FOR STATIC TESTING<br />

The Structural and Dynamic Test Facility at Brough is BAE Systems’ centre of excellence for structural testing, responsible for providing evidence that airframes meet the design requirements for structural strength and durability.

The F-35 airframe will be connected to a highly complex test rig in which 165 hydraulic actuators will replicate the loads the aircraft would see in flight. The data from the test will be captured by 4,000 sensors bonded to the airframe.

The test rig itself weighs around 365 tons and has approximately 53 miles (85km) of wiring spread around it to connect all the systems and sensors. The computing power available to control the load applications is roughly the equivalent of 25 high-specification personal computers.

Testing is planned to begin in late July and will take about 15 months, certifying the strength of the airframe and its components and contributing to the aircraft’s flight envelope expansion requirements. Upon completion of its static testing programme, AG-1 will be shipped back to the U.S.

The F-35 is being built in three variants: conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL), short takeoff/ vertical landing (STOVL) and carrier variant (CV). CTOL and CV durability airframe tests will also be undertaken at BAE Systems Brough site. Static testing of other F-35 airframes is under way at Lockheed Martin’s Fort Worth facility.

In March, the U.K. Ministry of Defence announced it intends to order three instrumented STOVL F-35 Lightning II test aircraft and associated support equipment for Operational Test and Evaluation purposes.

About BAE Systems
BAE Systems is the premier global defence, security and aerospace company delivering a full range of products and services for air, land and naval forces, as well as advanced electronics, security, information technology solutions and customer support services. With approximately 105,000 employees worldwide, BAE Systems’ sales exceeded £18.5 billion (US $34.4 billion) in 2008.

For further information contact:
Marc Boulton, BAE Systems
Tel: +44 (0) 7801 716011 Fax: +44 (0) 1772 852052
marc.boulton@baesystems.com

John Neilson, BAE Systems
Tel: + 44 (0) 1252 384795 Mob: + 44 (0)7802 337704
john.neilson@baesystems.com

Issued by:
BAE Systems, Farnborough, Hampshire GU14 6YU, UK
Tel: +44 (0) 1252 384719 Fax: +44 (0) 1252 383947
24hr media hotline: + 44 (0) 7801 717739
www.baesystems.com

Bookmark and Share

F-35 Lightning II Brings 5th Generation Capabilities to the Navy

WASHINGTON, May 1 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — A Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) executive said Friday that the 5th Generation F-35 Lightning II will help meet the challenges of future forces across the range of military operations.

“The F-35 was designed to operate and survive in high-threat battlespace defined by advanced surface-to-air missile systems, and while outnumbered by top-of-the-line 4th generation fighters - a distinct probability for future combat scenarios faced by naval aviators,” said Steve O’Bryan, vice president of Lockheed Martin F-35 Business Development. “The F-35 will incorporate the most advanced net-enabled mission systems, sensor and communications suite ever fielded in a fighter aircraft. It will be a key node in the kind of information-collection and distribution networks so valuable to sea, land and air forces today and in the future.”

Speaking Friday at a U.S. Navy League media luncheon at the Lockheed Martin Fighter Demonstration Center in Crystal City, Va., O’Bryan noted that, “The character of warfare isn’t static - it isn’t simply about lethality or a better sheaf of thunderbolts. In recent conflict we’ve seen wider distribution of forces and capabilities across more complex environments. This has highlighted the increased value of information exchange and collaboration - functions that the F-35 is designed to participate in and to enable.” The luncheon preceded the Navy League Sea Air Space Exposition in National Harbor, Md., May 4-6.

O’Bryan pointed to the pillars of the F-35 program - affordability, survivability, lethality and supportability - and highlighted the F-35’s value proposition. “As a 5th generation fighter, the F-35 is redefining the term ‘multi-role fighter’ by combining unprecedented situational awareness, net-enabled systems, sensor fusion, advanced sustainment, stealth and fighter performance in an affordable and supportable package. These next-generation capabilities will maintain the U.S. Navy as the premier sea force for decades to come.

“The key to affordability is the commonality of the tri-variant design of the F-35, with two interchangeable engines, a sustainment tool set and a common avionics system and air frame,” O’Bryan said. “The F-35 provides ‘best value’ in a package that not only deters hostilities and ensures national sovereignty, but enhances interoperability among the services and allied nations.

“The F-35 will be flown by the U.S. Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps, as well as our closest allies. This, combined with the unmatched interoperability of the F-35, will be essential to link the 1,000-ship Navy and the 100-wing Air Force,” O’Bryan added.

The F-35 is a supersonic, multi-role, 5th generation stealth fighter. Three F-35 variants derived from a common design, developed together and using the same sustainment infrastructure worldwide will replace at least 13 types of aircraft for 11 nations initially, making the Lightning II the most cost-effective fighter program in history.

Lockheed Martin is developing the F-35 with its principal industrial partners, Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems. Two separate, interchangeable F-35 engines are under development: the Pratt & Whitney F135 and the GE Rolls-Royce Fighter Engine Team F136.

Headquartered in Bethesda, Md., Lockheed Martin is a global security company that employs about 146,000 people worldwide and is principally engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture, integration and sustainment of advanced technology systems, products and services. The corporation reported 2008 sales of $42.7 billion.

F-35 and Lightning II are trademarks of Lockheed Martin Corporation.

For additional information, visit our Web site:

http://www.lockheedmartin.com

SOURCE Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company

Dutch coalition partners divided on JSF decision

Labour Party will not support the purchase of the JSF test aircraft.

Defence Professionals

07:01 GMT, April 23, 2009 A heated debate took place at the Dutch parliament yesterday regarding whether to purchase the first two Lockheed Martin-built F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) fighter aircraft. The debate began at 4pm and continued late into the night as serious disagreements between the three coalition partners emerged. These apparently irreconcilable differenced may have serious consequences for the Dutch cabinet, according to most national newspapers.

Labour, one of three parties in the coalition government, shocked the cabinet by stating they will not support the purchase of the JSF test aircraft, valued at €274 million.

A decision on whether to spend €6.1 billion to buy 85 fighter jets does not have to be made until 2010. However, according to the Labour party, agreeing to buy the test aircraft will commit the country to further purchases.

Labour’s parliamentary leader, Mariëtte Hamer, said she wants the Netherlands to remain involved in the development of the fighter but is opposed to binding the nation to such a large programme at this stage.

“We want to make sure we don’t get sucked into a billion euro project which may later turn out to have been the wrong decision,” Hamer was reported as saying.

The Christian Democrats (Christian Democratic Appeal) and defence ministry want to sign the deal to purchase the two aircraft by the end of this month. According to this block, the JSF is the correct aircraft to replace the fleet of F-16s currently used by the Royal Netherlands Air Force.

Deputy Defence Minister Jack de Vries announced he remains committed to the proposed purchase. He said that a decision not to buy the fighters would cost the country at least €873 million. A large part of that, €760 million, is made up of money the Netherlands has already invested in the programme. Beyond that, employment and research opportunities for Dutch companies would be lost as a result of the country leaving the programme. Mr de Vries further stressed that an agreement to buy the JSF test planes was part of the 2006 coalition accord and emphasized that the aircraft are urgently needed to train pilots.

The third party in the coalition government, the Christian Union, wants to purchase at least one JSF aircraft.

The Labour Party’s decision not to vote in favour of the purchase now means there is no majority support in parliament for the cabinet’s plan. It remains unclear what consequences this will have.

Hamer said Labour’s decision not to approve the purchase need not cause a coalition crisis. “We are not looking for a crisis,” she said. “We just want to make a good decision on behalf of the taxpayers.”

As regards the other major partners in the JSF programme, the UK has recently indicated that it will place an order for three test aircraft within this year, while Italy has cancelled the proposed purchase of two aircraft due to financial constraints.

Bookmark and Share

Computer Spies Breach Fighter-Jet Project

TECHNOLOGY APRIL 21, 2009

By SIOBHAN GORMAN, AUGUST COLE and YOCHI DREAZEN
The Wall Street Journal

WASHINGTON — Computer spies have broken into the Pentagon’s $300 billion Joint Strike Fighter project — the Defense Department’s costliest weapons program ever — according to current and former government officials familiar with the attacks.

Similar incidents have also breached the Air Force’s air-traffic-control system in recent months, these people say. In the case of the fighter-jet program, the intruders were able to copy and siphon off several terabytes of data related to design and electronics systems, officials say, potentially making it easier to defend against the craft.

The latest intrusions provide new evidence that a battle is heating up between the U.S. and potential adversaries over the data networks that tie the world together. The revelations follow a recent Wall Street Journal report that computers used to control the U.S. electrical-distribution system, as well as other infrastructure, have also been infiltrated by spies abroad.

Attacks like these — or U.S. awareness of them — appear to have escalated in the past six months, said one former official briefed on the matter. “There’s never been anything like it,” this person said, adding that other military and civilian agencies as well as private companies are affected. “It’s everything that keeps this country going.”

Many details couldn’t be learned, including the specific identity of the attackers, and the scope of the damage to the U.S. defense program, either in financial or security terms. In addition, while the spies were able to download sizable amounts of data related to the jet-fighter, they weren’t able to access the most sensitive material, which is stored on computers not connected to the Internet.

Former U.S. officials say the attacks appear to have originated in China. However it can be extremely difficult to determine the true origin because it is easy to mask identities online.

A Pentagon report issued last month said that the Chinese military has made “steady progress” in developing online-warfare techniques. China hopes its computer skills can help it compensate for an underdeveloped military, the report said.

The Chinese Embassy said in a statement that China “opposes and forbids all forms of cyber crimes.” It called the Pentagon’s report “a product of the Cold War mentality” and said the allegations of cyber espionage are “intentionally fabricated to fan up China threat sensations.”

The U.S. has no single government or military office responsible for cyber security. The Obama administration is likely to soon propose creating a senior White House computer-security post to coordinate policy and a new military command that would take the lead in protecting key computer networks from intrusions, according to senior officials.

The Bush administration planned to spend about $17 billion over several years on a new online-security initiative and the Obama administration has indicated it could expand on that. Spending on this scale would represent a potential windfall for government agencies and private contractors at a time of falling budgets. While specialists broadly agree that the threat is growing, there is debate about how much to spend in defending against attacks.

The Joint Strike Fighter, also known as the F-35 Lightning II, is the costliest and most technically challenging weapons program the Pentagon has ever attempted. The plane, led by Lockheed Martin Corp., relies on 7.5 million lines of computer code, which the Government Accountability Office said is more than triple the amount used in the current top Air Force fighter.

Six current and former officials familiar with the matter confirmed that the fighter program had been repeatedly broken into. The Air Force has launched an investigation.

Pentagon officials declined to comment directly on the Joint Strike Fighter compromises. Pentagon systems “are probed daily,” said Air Force Lt. Col. Eric Butterbaugh, a Pentagon spokesman. “We aggressively monitor our networks for intrusions and have appropriate procedures to address these threats.” U.S. counterintelligence chief Joel Brenner, speaking earlier this month to a business audience in Austin, Texas, warned that fighter-jet programs have been compromised.

Foreign allies are helping develop the aircraft, which opens up other avenues of attack for spies online. At least one breach appears to have occurred in Turkey and another country that is a U.S. ally, according to people familiar with the matter.

Joint Strike Fighter test aircraft are already flying, and money to build the jet is included in the Pentagon’s budget for this year and next.

Computer systems involved with the program appear to have been infiltrated at least as far back as 2007, according to people familiar with the matter. Evidence of penetrations continued to be discovered at least into 2008. The intruders appear to have been interested in data about the design of the plane, its performance statistics and its electronic systems, former officials said.

The intruders compromised the system responsible for diagnosing a plane’s maintenance problems during flight, according to officials familiar with the matter. However, the plane’s most vital systems — such as flight controls and sensors — are physically isolated from the publicly accessible Internet, they said.

The intruders entered through vulnerabilities in the networks of two or three contractors helping to build the high-tech fighter jet, according to people who have been briefed on the matter. Lockheed Martin is the lead contractor on the program, and Northrop Grumman Corp. and BAE Systems PLC also play major roles in its development.

Lockheed Martin and BAE declined to comment. Northrop referred questions to Lockheed.

The spies inserted technology that encrypts the data as it’s being stolen; as a result, investigators can’t tell exactly what data has been taken. A former Pentagon official said the military carried out a thorough cleanup.

Fighting online attacks like these is particularly difficult because defense contractors may have uneven network security, but the Pentagon is reliant on them to perform sensitive work. In the past year, the Pentagon has stepped up efforts to work with contractors to improve computer security.

Investigators traced the penetrations back with a “high level of certainty” to known Chinese Internet protocol, or IP, addresses and digital fingerprints that had been used for attacks in the past, said a person briefed on the matter.

As for the intrusion into the Air Force’s air-traffic control systems, three current and former officials familiar with the incident said it occurred in recent months. It alarmed U.S. national security officials, particularly at the National Security Agency, because the access the spies gained could have allowed them to interfere with the system, said one former official. The danger is that intruders might find weaknesses that could be exploited to confuse or damage U.S. military craft.

Military officials declined to comment on the incident.

In his speech in Austin, Mr. Brenner, the U.S. counterintelligence chief, issued a veiled warning about threats to air traffic in the context of Chinese infiltration of U.S. networks. He spoke of his concerns about the vulnerability of U.S. air traffic control systems to cyber infiltration, adding “our networks are being mapped.” He went on to warn of a potential situation where “a fighter pilot can’t trust his radar.”

—Evan Perez contributed to this article.

Bookmark and Share

Gates outlines military spending overhaul

$140 million-per-plane F-22 stealth fighter is on the chopping block

Associated Press
updated 12:08 p.m. PT, Mon., April. 6, 2009
MSNBC

WASHINGTON - Defense Secretary Robert Gates on Monday recommended halting production of the F-22 fighter jet and scrapping a new helicopter for the president as he outlined deep cuts to many of the U.S. military’s biggest weapons programs.

Gates said his $534 billion budget proposal represents a “fundamental overhaul” in defense acquisition and reflects a shift in priorities from fighting conventional wars to the newer threats U.S. forces face from insurgents in places such as Afghanistan.

The department must ensure it has the right programs and money to “fight the wars we are in today and the scenarios we are most likely to face in the years to come, while at the same time providing a hedge against other risks,” Gates said as he revealed details of his budget for the next fiscal year.

The promised emphasis on budget paring is a reversal from the Bush years, which included a doubling of the Pentagon’s spending since 2001. Spending on tanks, fighter planes, ships, missiles and other weapons accounted for about a third of all defense spending last year. But Gates noted more money will be needed in areas such as personnel as the Army and Marines expand the size of their forces.

Lawmaker opposition
Gates will likely face stiff resistance in Congress, where lawmakers are wary of losing defense contractor jobs with an economy in crisis. Some defense contractors such as Lockheed Martin Corp. have warned of huge layoffs if programs are cut.

Production of the F-22 fighter jet, which cost $140 million apiece, would be halted at 187. Plans to build a new helicopter for the president and a helicopter to rescue downed pilots would be canceled. A new communications satellite would be scrapped and the program for a new Air Force transport plane would be ended.

Alex Brandon / AP file - An F-22 Raptor fighter jet

Some of the Pentagon’s most expensive programs would also be scaled back. The Army’s $160 billion Future Combat Systems modernization program would lose its armored vehicles. Plans to build a shield to defend against missile attacks by rogue states would also be scaled back.

Yet some programs would grow. Gates proposed speeding up production of the F-35 fighter jet, which could end up costing $1 trillion to manufacture and maintain 2,443 planes. The military would buy more speedy ships that can operate close in to land. And more money would be spent outfitting special forces troops that can hunt down insurgents.

“It is important to remember that every defense dollar spent to over-ensure against a remote or diminishing risk — or in effect to run up the score in a capability where the United States is already dominant — is a dollar not available to take care of our people, reset the force, win the wars we are in and improve capabilities in areas where we are underinvested and potentially vulnerable,” Gates said.

The Government Accountability Office reported last week that 96 of the Pentagon’s biggest weapons contracts were over budget by a “staggering” figure of $296 billion.

A bill in Congress would require the Pentagon to do a better job of making sure proposed weapons are affordable and perform the way they should before the military spends big sums on them. The Defense Department has already adjusted its acquisitions policy to achieve some of those goals.

Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Bookmark and Share

Israel Said to be Near Compromise on F-35 Fighters

18 March 2009

Air Force Technology

Israel is close to dropping an effort to put its own electronic warfare know-how into Lockheed Martin’s F-35 joint strike fighter, a mainstay of its future strike force, a Pentagon official said on Tuesday.

Incorporating Israel’s system into the model being built for it “is not going to happen,” said Jon Schreiber, who heads the programme’s international aspects.

“I think our system will meet their requirements with some tweaking, and I think they’re starting to come around to that realisation themselves,” he told Reuters in an interview.

The issue is sensitive because senior Israeli military officials had maintained that their aircraft must incorporate electronic warfare technologies developed by state-controlled Rafael Advanced Defense Systems.

An Israeli embassy spokesman referred a caller to the Ministry of Defense, which could not be immediately reached for comment.

Dropping plans for incorporating sensitive Israeli technology onto the F-35 would be a significant departure for Israel. Israeli F-15s and F-16s were modified to carry Israeli electronic warfare, radars, munitions and command and control systems.

Israel is set to become a kind of trailblazer for the F-35, which is being developed by the United States and eight international partners: Britain, Italy, the Netherlands, Turkey, Canada, Australia, Denmark and Norway.

Israel has gone further than any non-consortium member toward acquisition, with plans to buy an initial 25 F-35A’s in fiscal 2012 for delivery starting in 2014 and an option for 50 more.

The F-35 is a radar-evading, single-engine aircraft, designed to switch quickly between air-to-ground and air-to-air missions while still flying.

The models built for Israel would incorporate Israeli-made data links, radios and other command and control equipment, but not the electronic warfare suite, largely because of the high cost of integrating it, Schreiber said.

“They have pretty tight budget constraints and we’re attempting to fit their requirements into their budget,” he said. Officials from the Pentagon’s F-35 joint programme office met Israeli procurement officials in New York on Monday to discuss the programme, Schreiber added without elaborating on their talks.

“We expect to get a revised letter of request from [Israel] within the next month or so,” and anticipate that a government-to-government deal will be concluded by the end of this year or early next year, he said.

US instructor pilots would join Israeli pilots to train at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, on four of the aircraft built for Israel, Schreiber said. By early 2015, the US instructors would transition to Israel to continue training pilots there.

Singapore, the other non-consortium member linked to the programme through a special status, appears likely to start buying as many as 100 F-35s a year or two after Israel, Schreiber said.

He expected an agreement to be signed with Singapore within the next month detailing security safeguards for programme information as a prelude to ‘more serious discussions’ about acquiring the F-35.

“At this point, we don’t have any indication from Singapore that they want to put anything unique in the airplane,” he said. “They want to go with a plain vanilla airplane.”

F-35 competitors include Saab AB’s Gripen, the Dassault Aviation SA Rafale, Russia’s MiG-35 and Sukhoi Su-35, and the Eurofighter Typhoon made by a consortium of British, German, Italian and Spanish companies

Lockheed’s chief F-35 subcontractors are Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems. Two rival, interchangeable F-35 engines are under development. One is built by United Technologies’s Pratt & Whitney unit; the other by a team of General Electric and Rolls-Royce Group.

By Jim Wolf, Reuters.

Bookmark and Share

First U.S. Marine Pilots Lockheed Martin F-35

Lockheed Martin

FORT WORTH, Texas, March 19th, 2009 —

Maj. Joseph T. “O.D.” Bachmann today became the first U.S. Marine Corps pilot to fly the Lockheed Martin [NYSE: LMT] F-35 Lightning II, logging the flight-test program’s 90th mission. He is the fifth pilot to fly the stealthy, multi-role fighter.

Bachmann departed the runway at Lockheed Martin’s Fort Worth plant at 11:29 a.m. CDT and flew the aircraft to 15,000 feet, checking handling qualities and engine response before landing one hour and 15 minutes later.

“The plane performed wonderfully,” said Bachmann, a member of the F-35 Integrated Test Force and one of the team test pilots who will fly the F-35B Lightning II at the Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Md., test site, beginning this summer. “The U.S. Marine Corps will be getting an aircraft with extraordinary capabilities that is very easy to fly. Today is another step toward delivery of the first jets to Marines on the front line.”

With U.S. Marine Corps pilot Maj. Joseph T. Bachmann at the controls, the F-35 Lightning II lifts off from the runway at Lockheed Martin in Fort Worth, Texas, on March 19. Bachmann became the first Marine to fly the F-35, which will enter operational service with the Corps in 2012. (Photo by John Wilson, Lockheed Martin)

Bachmann’s first flight was in F-35 AA-1, a conventional takeoff and landing variant with controls and flying qualities essentially identical to the short takeoff/vertical landing (STOVL) F-35B. The F-35B will replace Marine Corps AV-8B STOVL fighters and F/A-18 strike fighters. It will be the Marines’ primary fighter, and will provide a unique combination of capabilities: stealth, supersonic speed, STOVL basing flexibility and network-enabled mission systems.

Bachmann is the second active-duty service member to fly the F-35. U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. James “Flipper” Kromberg first piloted the Lightning II on Jan. 30, 2008. Bachmann has more than 2,000 hours of flight time in more than 30 different types of aircraft and is currently qualified in the F/A-18 A-F.

During his military career, Bachmann made two deployments in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom – one from the “Harrier Carrier,” USS Bataan, and the other land-based at Al Asad, Iraq. During flight operations in Iraq, Bachmann earned four Air Medals and a Navy Commendation with a Combat V.

U.S. Marine Corps pilot Maj. Joseph T. Bachmann became the first Marine to fly the F-35 Lightning II, on March 19, 2009. (Photo by Tom Harvey, Lockheed Martin)

The F-35 is a supersonic, multi-role, 5th generation stealth fighter. Three F-35 variants derived from a common design, developed together and using the same sustainment infrastructure worldwide will replace at least 13 types of aircraft for 11 nations initially, making the Lightning II the most cost-effective fighter program in history.

Headquartered in Bethesda, Md., Lockheed Martin is a global security company that employs about 146,000 people worldwide and is principally engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture, integration and sustainment of advanced technology systems, products and services. The corporation reported 2008 sales of $42.7 billion.

F-35 and Lightning II are trademarks of Lockheed Martin Corporation.

Bookmark and Share

UK Announce First Joint Strike Fighter Purchase

19 March 2009

Ai Force Technology

The MoD has announced the purchase of three of the next generation of supersonic stealth fast jets, the joint stiike fighters (JSF).

The UK variant will be a multi-role fighter / attack aircraft with a short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) capability similar to the current joint force Harrier, and will be able to operate from land bases or aircraft carriers.

The new aircraft will replace the joint force Harriers over which it has the advantage of supersonic flight, stealth, improved survivability and range, and being able to carry munitions inboard and externally.

UK Defence Secretary John Hutton said that the joint strike fighter would form an essential part of the UK’s future combat air capability.

“By purchasing three aircraft for testing, we will secure access to the development of the programme. Working alongside their US colleagues, our pilots will gain an unrivalled understanding of this awesome aircraft and its capabilities,” Hutton said.

“This is a vital programme for UK defence both for the military and for industry, with over 100 UK companies involved in the programme.”

JSF will fly off the two new Royal Navy Queen Elizabeth Class aircraft carriers. The purchase of three test aircraft will enable MoD to move forward in developing the carrier strike capability.

Compared with the conventional take-off and landing (F-35A) variant already flying, the F-35B has a shaft-driven lift fan mounted behind the cockpit, roll ducts installed in the wing and swivelling nozzle fitted to the engine.

In STOVL mode, doors open above and below the lift fan, a clutch engages to drive the two-stage contra-rotating fan from the engine and the rear nozzle pivots downward to deflect engine thrust.

By Daniel Garrun.

Bookmark and Share

F-35 Lightning II – Meeting Performance Requirements, On Schedule For Deliveries

Lockheed Martin

MELBOURNE, Australia, March 10th, 2009 — With strong international partnerships firmly established, the Lockheed Martin [NYSE: LMT] F-35 Lightning II (also known as the Joint Strike Fighter) continues to meet or exceed its milestones in both performance and schedule. The program is moving quickly into its production and support phase, and will be ready when Australia needs it as its future fighter.

At the Australian International Airshow, Tom Burbage, Lockheed Martin executive vice president for F-35 Program Integration, said flight testing is on track and the aircraft is performing extremely well. “The aircraft and its systems are proving to be significantly more mature at this stage of testing than those of past programs,” Burbage said. “The program is achieving established milestones and retiring technical risk according to plan. Production activities are accelerating with all SDD aircraft and the first six LRIP aircraft already in assembly,” he said.

Burbage added that the F-35 is by far the most capable fighter available on the international market. It is designed for superiority in both the air-to-air and air-to-ground roles. Its combination of stealth and advanced sensor systems will provide vastly improved situational awareness and survivability over the most advanced 4th generation aircraft.

Also at the air show, Maj. Gen. (Select) David Heinz, F-35 Deputy Program Executive Officer, spoke about the U.S. government’s backing of the program. “We have the military services’ commitment to procure the aircraft in large quantities, and that is important to keeping the cost down and the program affordable,” he said. “The United States Government is committed to keeping this 5th Generation fighter on cost and on schedule.”

Air Vice Marshall John Harvey, Australia’s program manager of New Air Combat Capability, added, “The F-35 continues to make good progress and Defence and Australian industry are working closely with their international partners to make the F-35 Program a great success.”

Milestones achieved in 2008 and 2009 continue to validate the F-35’s continued success: The successful first flight of F-35 BF-1 on June 11, 2008; the deployment of F-35 AA-1 to Edwards AFB, Calif., with all tests accomplished ahead of schedule; and recently, the successful first flight of F-35 BF-2 on February 25, 2009. The program remains onschedule to deliver the first production-modelF-35s to Eglin Air Force Base, Fla.,in 2010 and to meet all services’ Initial Operational Capability dates, starting in 2012.

The F-35 is a supersonic, multi-role, 5th generation stealth fighter. Three F-35 variants derived from a common design, developed together and using the same sustainment infrastructure worldwide will replace at least 13 types of aircraft for 11 nations initially, making the Lightning II the most cost-effective fighter program in history.

Headquartered in Bethesda, Md., Lockheed Martin is a global security company that employs about 146,000 people worldwide and is principally engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture, integration and sustainment of advanced technology systems, products and services. The corporation reported 2008 sales of $42.7 billion.

Bookmark and Share